Skip to content

MedView Flow

Welcome to the MedView Flow forum, please share your ideas with us!

To make your voice heard, be sure to vote on existing ideas and/or submit a new idea. While we can’t guarantee any specific features or timelines, we promise to read and consider all suggestions.

We may also merge and rename suggestions for clarity. We have partnered with UserVoice, a third-party service and your use of the portal and your submission is subject to the UserVoice Terms of Service & Privacy Policy, including the license terms. Please do not send any novel or patentable ideas, copyrighted materials, samples or demos for which you do not want to grant a license to MedView.



Thanks for supporting MedView.

We are listening and we really appreciate your feedback!


MedView Flow

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

12 results found

  1. THERE IS NO OPTION TO DELETE COMPLETED SCRIPTS WHICH IS NOT VALID
    EX : DUE TO MEDVIEW FRED DISPENSE INTEGREATION ERROR SOME SCRIPTS DIDN'T SHOW UP IN DISPENSING BUT THEY WERE DISPENSED IN MEDVIEW FLOW AND IT SHOWS UP AS COMPLETED BUT THOSE COMPLETED SCRIPTS ARE INVALID .

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Try this instead  ·  Tamia responded

    Hi we have a remove function against the basket which is at the top of the basket. You can also remove individual scripts in the basket by pressing the X on the tab. One of our consultants will reach out to you for more information

  2. As there are no paper script or duplicate script to be labelled, the additional smaller labels are not required, so FRED shouldn't print on them.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. I understand that space on the labels is tight, but having it printed on the label where the repeat has been issued to will help patients locate their future tokens.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. 0 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Using A4 paper is forcing pharmacists to use paper that they will have to supply [ie pay for]. This must be going to save the PBS/Medicare millions of dollars - there will be less repeat forms needed and less prescription forms needed. Maybe an increase in the dispensing fee is warranted or PBS can supply A4 paper as well as repeats forms!

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Integrations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. If we receive an eScript token by email, it is necessary to open the link, copy the token, open Flow and, finally, paste the token to find out who the patient is. It is not until then that we can make an informed decision what action to take. [eg dispense now, file for future use, wait until patient presents]. This adds significantly to the workload - we are essentially half-processing the script before we know whether that is appropriate. There must be a way to identify the patient earlier in the email process. Once in the "IN" area of Medview…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi Stephen, Regarding your point around identifying the Patient in the email heading for the token, we're unable to display their name due to ADHA's conformance points to not identify the Patient at that stage. In regards to the issues around half-processing scripts we believe the ASL will ease this problem. We're happy to take some further feedback from you if you'd like to reply to this comment

  7. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Eg: APO- Escitalopram is only listed with NHS: 8700X, however the manufacturers have advised that it can also be supplied with NHS: 9432K. Currently when changing the NHS code in Fred Dispense, it is being rejected by Medicare (R780).

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. In FRED Dispense when the "Responsible Pharmacist" has been checked for that dispense terminal and is displayed up the top next to the menus, the ALT key shortcut "R" is duplicated. Please fix this.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Ability to print paper token on PBS supplied A5 repeat paper. Would allow for better work flow and uniformity for patients that want paper tokens

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Can there be more flexibility in the resizing of the screen in the browser? We'd like to shrink it down to fit 2 windows on a large screen and it's not workable.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Try this instead  ·  Tamia responded

    Hi Amanda, one of our consultants contacted you about this and zooming out using the browser settings has resolved this

  12. When Medview flow imports script data into FRED, it should also import the date of birth, address, phone number, email as these details are available on the escript already and are required to dispense the escript, it is just an extra step to have to input them manually.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?